On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Pall Thayer wrote:
Because I don't really know the nature of the project.
you're right - it depends on their priorities. so ... if performance is important, i would probably not want to have perl running, when there's already a java vm. (or vice versa ;)
blip, ub
On Monday 08 December 2003 16:31, [·] wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Pall Thayer wrote:
Here's how I would do it:
I would make a perl based server with a socket that accepts data and sends it back out. Put a netsend in your PD patch and connect to the perl server.
perl in the middle sounds a bit redundant to me. why not connect directly to a java server's listening socket?
blip, ub
-- Pall Thayer artist/teacher http://www.this.is/pallit http://www.this.is/isjs http://www.this.is/harmony http://130.208.220.190/panse
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.at http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
. . .. . . . . http://blue.test.at . . . ..