24 May
2008
24 May
'08
9:32 p.m.
chris clepper wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 7:18 AM, Patrice Colet <pat@mamalala.org mailto:pat@mamalala.org> wrote:
Hi, it's possible to render on a video file the texture drawn into a geo object, but the quality is always poor whatever codec we use (even uncompressed files), that can be useful for having poor animated textures, but anyway the quality is never as good as we can get when we render into picture files (isn't it?).The contents of the framebuffer are exactly what you see onscreen. I don't understand what is 'poor' about the image being read back.
you are right, I only want to add two tiny comments: gemframebuffer does not allow changing of view and perspec and it has no FSAA like onscreen. marius.