28 Mar
2022
28 Mar
'22
10:55 p.m.
On Sun, 2022-03-27 at 22:39 +0200, Christof Ressi wrote:
On 27.03.2022 18:22, Christof Ressi wrote:
I guess you should be able to do [3 3( -> [text get] to get the second sublist, but [3 4( -> [text get] should probably trigger an out-of-range error.
I meant to write [0 3 3( -> [text get] and [0 3 4( -> [text get]...
Another side note: it would be nice if a negative field count for [text get] would output all fields up to the next seperator (comma or semi).
I agree and it does so already.
Roman