----- Original Message -----
From: Ivica Ico Bukvic ico@vt.edu To: 'Roman Haefeli' reduzent@gmail.com; pd-list@iem.at Cc: Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 9:30 PM Subject: Re: [PD] enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?
[...]
Even based on all that has transpired since, the reports we've gotten so far are:
- $@ issue which IMHO is a non-issue since I don't consider this a feature
I wish to advertise as a feature just yet (for exact reasons why it was brought up) 2) UTF inconsistency you reported that is a genuine bug 3) iemgui positioning which I would consider (IMHO) a fix, not a bug
All in all, AFAICT this leaves us with #2.
Also see the end of: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTPZxcgWoI0
When undoing the creation of an object or objects, at some point Pd-l2ork will move the object to the place where the mouse happened to be hovering when the user clicked <ctrl-1> to get an empty box dangling from the mouse. But the user never actually anchored the object there-- they only anchored it somewhere once they clicked the mouse button. Thus, your undo history erroneously adds an object placement event that was never performed by the user in the first place.
Theoretically the corresponding undo event should make the object dangle from the mouse again, but that's of very little practical value and would just bloat the undo history with an extra step for every object in the chain. Instead this event should simply not be added to the undo history. I don't know the innards of pd well, but those "dangle" events should all have a single "0" as a coordinate so maybe you can check for that.
-Jonathan
Best wishes,
Ico
Roman
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list