well, FYI in Jitter you do [jit.someobject @color r g b a] (for
example), or can use a message named color.
Ive never seen or used [jit.someobject @red r @green g @blue b @alpha a]
and jitter also has just about every colorspace conversion possible,
that I have ever seen or dealt with professionally, and many I have
not heard of or ever had to use:
http://cycling74.com/documentation/jit.colorspace
Not meant as flame bait (sorry, I still feel like an ass for yesterday
Mathieu!), but more for compare/contrast.
I quite like the attribute system jitter has, and think it could be
imported with some sort of syntax highlighting for objects where
attribute names are one color and their set values another.
It would (may?) help visually grokking the text within the patcher
object
On Dec 6, 2007, at 2:16 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, marius schebella wrote:
the most obvious and useful things are the tons of @arguments that
each objects accepts.Having tons of @arguments is not necessarily a blessing. Wherever
Jitter has four @arguments named red,green,blue,alpha, GridFlow has
only one, which is a list of the four colour components after a
[#pack]. It makes GridFlow more structured than Jitter in this case,
and that makes some objects more open to different colour spaces
than Jitter's, in addition to yielding a better features-per- @arguments ratio._ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC
Canada_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list