Nope. It's gone. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1388451
Andras
2010/9/13 Pedro Lopes pedro.lopes@ist.utl.pt
Sorry just double checking something András... there's no rt kernel for 64 bits Ubuntu? (or you're saying for the lucid lynx?)
Cause karmic koala has rt, I have Ubuntu Studio 64 bits with rt [1]
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/9.10release_notes
2010/9/13 András Murányi muranyia@gmail.com
Ahh, livna.... You know, know that i have convinced my Fedora friends to switch to Ubuntu, what do I tall them when i go back? :o) I'll take a look at it, and also at home-brewing a kernel. Maybe that's the way forward.
Thanks, Andras
2010/9/13 Bernardo Barros bernardobarros2@gmail.com
Then you have to add Fusion free+non-free (maybe livna?) to your repos.
2010/9/13 András Murányi muranyia@gmail.com:
Hhh, switching distro seems harder than moving to another country sometimes... :o) I heard that some non-free stuff if missing from Fedora, does CCRMA
have
these? Like some proprietary codecs, etc...
2010/9/13 Bernardo Barros bernardobarros2@gmail.com
yes, planet_ccrma is a repo for the Fedora/CentOS/RedHat family I like it
2010/9/13 András Murányi muranyia@gmail.com:
Hmm, hmm. That means switching to Fedora, right?
2010/9/13 Bernardo Barros bernardobarros2@gmail.com > > Planet CCRMA offers rt-kernel for x86_64 systems. Give it a try. > > 2010/9/13 András Murányi muranyia@gmail.com: > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:59 PM, jm jones juanmjv@gmail.com
wrote:
> >> > >> Hi, usually I install the 64 bits version of, but the last time,
I
> >> dont remember why : ) (maybe to avoid any problems) I installed
the
> >> 32 > >> bits version of Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. Is a repo of pd-extended for
10.04
> >> available? > >> And about the 32 vs 64 bits, what are your choices? And what
about
> >> distros? Pure:dyne seems more lightweight with his xfce desktop, > >> however I have a good processor (core 2 duo intel e7200) and 2gb
of
> >> ram, planning an update to 6gb, so I dont know if xfce is a must
for
> >> me. > >> Im a "veteran" gnu/linux user, but the last years I was using OS
X
> >> and > >> W7 for music making. In Linux I want to use pd, Renoise (its > >> available > >> as 64 bits too), and wine for some vsts. > >> > > > > Hi There, > > > > I'm sort of a veteran too (started on IBM AIX in 1992, used Red
Hat
> > for > > a > > long time, then went back to Windows 98, later XP, which i gave
up
> > finally a > > few years ago). > > I'm using vanilla Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit with Gnome (and 2GB of
memory),
> > and my > > impression is that it's not the WM that makes things slow, but in
the
> > case > > of Pd, it's Pd itself. Read the archives on GUI<->core
communication
> > and > > Tcl/Tk weirdnesses. The 64-bit version of Pd is quite tidy now,
well
> > actually there was a time when it seemed to me a bit slower than
the
> > 32-bit > > version, but AFAIK there's no reason for that any more (?) > > With a decent CPU and that huge amount of RAM you (will) have, it > > really > > cannot be a question of WM whatsoever. Of course, the system has
to
> > be > > tuned > > for realtime, undisturbed audio usage, which may include getting
rid
> > of > > eye-candy functions, but i never experienced a problem with
those.
> > After > > all, they use openGL, don't they? > > The same stands for pure:dyne; at the core it's a linux kernel,
and
> > what > > you > > install on (or remove from) the top, it's up to you. > > The only thing i'm missing here on 64-bit is the RT kernel. Once
i
> > find > > a > > nice quick way, i'll grab it, but i'm not really into
home-brewing my
> > kernel. :) > >
-- Muranyi Andras
-- Muranyi Andras
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-- Pedro Lopes (ongoing MSc) contact: pedro.lopes@ist.utl.pt website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes