Hi all,
I'm thinking of adding "parallelize" and "serialize" options to list that (I think) would include the function of "drip"... and I think I should add "list length" too.
The negative index thing for "nth" sounds like a bad idea, out of keeping with Pd's more usual style of limiting out-of-range values to the end of the range in question.
I'm more worried about bug fixes and new platgorms (a64; macintel) at the moment, though...
cheers Miller
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 09:50:02AM +0800, Chris McCormick wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 12:01:29PM +0200, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote:
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:14:46 +0200 From: Frank Barknecht fbar@footils.org Subject: Re: [PD] feature request for [list]
Hallo, Chris McCormick hat gesagt: // Chris McCormick wrote:
So basically I'd like to see a [list length] and an [s2l].
You can do "list length" with a simple counter and "list split" already. It's called [list-len] in [list]-abs. However unfolding a list using [until] and [list split] is very slow. I did benchmarks comparing it to [drip] and it takes ages longer. As a "drip" operation is used so often - Matju once compared it to the "for"-loop of other languages - it is important that "drip" is fast, and not only fast, but very fast. I'd much prefer to have a fast unfolding operation over getting "list length".
Yes, good point.
And negative indices are just very convenient, and the object is already in.
I don't think that [s2l] should become part of [list]. To me it is a typical string operation, like Perl's split and string.split() in Python.
Agreed. If someone made patches against Miller's Pd and put it in SF patch tracker would these probably make it in?
Chris.
chris@mccormick.cx http://mccormick.cx
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list