2 Jan
2002
2 Jan
'02
7:19 p.m.
Should be no difference in execution time.
In throw~/catch~ you should watch order of execution so that the catch~ comes later, otherwise you pick up a 64-sample delay. (I take care of this by using subpatches with signal connections between them; as long as a subpatch with throw~ objects is audio-connected somehow to the subpatch with a catch~ you won't get the delay.
cheers Miller
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 06:58:17PM +0100, Søren Bovbjerg wrote:
does anyone know which way is more efficient? potentially the "all in one inlet" approach could be (since pd knows more about what is really going on).
I usually use throw~ and catch~ to mix signals. I don't know about difference in CPU usage between catch~ and +~ Anybody?
/Soeren