Miller Puckette said this at Sat, 22 Mar 2003 10:52:14 -0800:
I think if (3) is easy that's the best. In my experience portaudio almost always moves in the direction of greater robustness.
Agreed about portaudio. No matter what else might be true of the architecture (see Chris's comments later), it does get better.
So, if people want to replace their /usr/local/pd/bin/pd file with the file from: http://homepage.mac.com/atl/.cv/atl/Public/pd-pa-new-binary.tar.gz-link.gz ...then please, have fun, have a little test. Back up before installing, but you knew that already. :)
Cheers, adam
FYI I'm right now getting ready to try PA V19. My guess is that it will soon be robust enough to use in the main Pd dist.
cheers Miller
What should I do?
- Check in the new pa_mac_core.c and let curious people compile the
devel_0_36 branch? 2) Point people to the portaudio tarball and let them experiment with the sources themselves? http://portaudio.com/archives/pa_snapshot_v18.tar.gz 3) Seed a new pd/bin/pd binary to people who want to test the updated portaudio stuff with a range of hardware?
adam
--
Adam T. Lindsay atl@comp.lancs.ac.uk Computing Dept, Lancaster University +44(0)1524/594.537 Lancaster, LA1 4YR, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/593.608 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.kug.ac.at http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list