hi hc
i allway use a [t b b b] X [realtime]
and connect the 2nd bang of the trigger to the operation that i want to measure.
for measuring this operation multiple times you can add a
[100( | [until]
after the 2nd bang
eni
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Sounds very cool. Just out of curiosty, how did you measure the speed
difference? That would be a useful technic to know about for testing
in general..hc
On Feb 25, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
seems like it would fit better on this mailing-list.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:38:27 -0500 (EST) From: Mathieu Bouchard matju@artengine.ca To: Frank Barknecht fbar@footils.org Cc: pd-dev@iem.at Subject: [PD-dev] extremely fast pure pd [list-drip]
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Frank Barknecht wrote:
such a standard library would define an *interface* for standard objects. Where performance is an issue, the interface could
alternatively implemented with externals. This also is exemplified in [list]-abs, where personally I use a version of [list-drip] that has zexy's
[drip] inside for speed reasons. It behaves exactly like the abstraction version so it doesn't matter if people don't have zexy installed.i just made a pure-pd [list-drip] that is much much quicker for
large lists than your pure pd [list-drip].For a list of size 32768, I find it to be at least 250 times faster.
For a list of size 4096, it's at least 24 times faster.
See attachment.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal, Québec<list-drip- quick.pd>_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Programs should be written for people to read, and only incidentally
for machines to execute.
- from Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list