i experienced a huge visual difference with configuring the ati
driver for os x manually.
see:
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2005-11/032450.html
the FSAA manipulations inside pd didn't doo much compared to that.
Am 06.04.2006 um 22:09 schrieb timon botez:
Thanks, but problems with macs is that drivers all comes bundled up
in the OS. Could you tell me what the max FSAA number is? And whats the main
difference in processing speed?Thanks, T.
On 6 Apr 2006, at 20:25, chris clepper wrote:
We place no limitations of this kind when it comes to dealing with
the GPU. Anything like this is very probably going to be a driver
issue.On 4/6/06, timon timon@sosolimited.com wrote: Hi, I have found some issues with screen sizes when sending FSAA number to gemwin. When I send any FSAA number (anything from 2-24) on a G5 running two screens i am not able to generate a window higher 1200 x 1000 . Sending 0 lets me make as big of a window as 3800x1200. But thats without any anti aliasing, and since Im working with text objects it looks a bit pre-dated. Is there anywhere I can find some information about optimising the FSAA while having big gem windows?
Its odd that the antialiasing affects the screen size. In older Gem versions this has not been an issue (sorry, dont mean to complain).
Thanks, Timon.
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list