Funny, I was just saying to Jamie about the "more than one way to do it" and how old working habits die hard. I've started to use list input distrubution much more recently, but still find I do things the old way by force of habit.
Maybe, as a personal choice, I find explicit operations are a bit easier to read. I often sum signals with [+~] just because it looks nicer and the flow stands out more.
a.
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:24:10 +0100 Jack jack@rybn.org wrote:
You also have : |1 0.4( | [- ]
++
Jack
Le 13 janv. 08 à 19:55, Jamie Bullock a écrit :
On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 17:17 +0000, Jamie Bullock wrote:
The pd abstraction is essentially syntactic sugar, so instead of doing:
|0.4( | [t b a] | / |1( / | / [- ]
You can just do:
|0.4( | [! - 1]
As someone just pointed out to me, this is also syntactic sugar for
the leaner:[0.4( | [swap 1] \ / [- ]
Jamie
-- www.postlude.co.uk
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list