Hallo, Matt Barber hat gesagt: // Matt Barber wrote:
All of that said, I think something like the [sampler~] object proposed in another post would be much in keeping with the "user-friendly" filter objects like [bp~] (as opposed to [rpole~] and [rzero~] which are the real "building block" kinds of filter classes). An object name like [sampler~] would indeed restrict its relevance to sampling, and the automatic interpolation schemes would support this restriction... such a thing might be useful in readsf~ contexts as well.
Though I would rather avoid the terms "sampler" or "sampling", as "sample" already has so many different meanings in the audio world, it almost lost all usefulness.
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__