Are you saying that utf-8-support is fully implemented, but Pd's font doesn't contain all symbols?
Yes.
On a minimal Debian Buster where I basically only installed Pd 0.51.3 from backports, I cannot display many symbols in Pd, although the same symbols are displayed correctly in the terminal. See attached screenshot with a clef example.
Well, your terminal obviously uses a different font. Just make sure that the Unicode codepoint you want to use is actually supported by the font that is used by Pd (DVSM on Windows/Linux, Menlo on macOS)
Christof
On 18.01.2021 13:48, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Mon, 2021-01-18 at 12:43 +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
afaik, the only thing that does not work¹ are emojis. while they are technically just unicode symbols, it seems that i cannot enter them (although they are displayed correctly, if you get them into the patch
Saying "the only thing that does not work" implies everything else works. I'm not sure what you exactly mean by that. Are you saying that utf-8-support is fully implemented, but Pd's font doesn't contain all symbols? Or do you even mean all utf-8 can be displayed in Pd (except emojis)?
On a minimal Debian Buster where I basically only installed Pd 0.51.3 from backports, I cannot display many symbols in Pd, although the same symbols are displayed correctly in the terminal. See attached screenshot with a clef example.
I don't have a problem with Pd's utf-8 support per se, but according to your statement I wonder what is expected and what is a bug.
Roman
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list