I think reasonable suggestions might be welcome.
Some say the sulphur fumes, screams and maniacal laughter emanating from Martin and Joe's subterranean laboratory beneath the opera house catacombs is too intimidating. But I've heard that mortals making offerings have been spared.
Occasionally.
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 13:04:44 -0400 (EDT) Mathieu Bouchard matju@artengine.ca wrote:
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011, Andy Farnell wrote:
If the developer exhibits a capacity for purposefulness, couldn't that same a sense of purpose be used to undo a mistake?
Well, the developer would have to think of those things as mistakes first, and also, to think of vanilla's ways as being the solutions. When the idea of «cleaner design than vanilla's» is to use a big if else if else if else if else if else if instead of the constructor table and instead of every method table, does it make it look like you or I has any business trying to change the mind of the author, and does that look easier than (!!!) submitting patches to Miller ?
| Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC