Ben,
Here I just fixed it for you and sent the changed version. If you
don't understand what's going on let me know.
Oh, I don't know what the "editmode" command that you have in your
patch is supposed to point to; I just pointed it to the graphics portion of the patch (which I've stuck in a subpatch). If you want it to apply to the processing portion of the patch you may want to further nest everything in a parent subpatch and have the editmode point to that parent. Once again, let me know if I'm not communicating this very well...
I've been doing a lot of abstraction work like this, so I use this
trick all the time. If it helps you should check out the abstractions I'm distributing on my site, they might provide other insights...
I see you've been talking to Matt ;), Chalmers hasn't given me any
indication of when they're going to accept me (why wouldn't they? :) So I wait with baited breath...
David
At 21:18 09/05/2003 -0400, bbogart@ryerson.ca wrote:
Hey David,
Its being sent from inside the abstraction.
I'm not sure about your suggestions, I can send the message to pd-xy.pd (where xy.pd is the filename of my abstraction) sending to the receive makes all instances of the abstraction visible. What receive can I send to in order to only open the abstraction who receives the signal to generate that message?
; pd-xy.pd vis 1
is my message
I tried $0-xy.pd vis 1 / pd-$0 vis 1 / pd-$0-xy.pd vis 1 / etc...
Here is my patch for clarification.
Ben
PS: When do you hear about getting into Chalmers?
. . David McCallum . Music wants to be free . http://mentalfloss.ca/sintheta/ .