21 Aug
2014
21 Aug
'14
6:42 p.m.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 06:06:52PM +0200, Cyrille Henry wrote:
yes, i prefer fudi to. but on small hardware, like the one i was developing 12 years ago, OSC was faster. not because of the reduced bandwidth, but because of the conversion between ascii character to float. but that time is over now, and this conversion should be quicker even on "small" hardware.
cheers c
I agree - this is still a problem for pd~, which uses FUDI. I've been thinking for years about making a binary form of FUDI:
f <4 byte float> s <zero-terminated character string> ; ,
One thing I keep wondering is how, in netsend/netreceive, to name this so that it won't get confused with raw binary. Maybe it justneeds a name (BUDI?)
cheers M