26 Jun
2006
26 Jun
'06
10:22 p.m.
On 6/26/06, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
I can't think of any reason the current way would be better, but I may be missing something.
i guess the reason is: simplicity on the implementation side. pd has no idea about which part of the object has been deleted, it just destroys the old object (e.g. [t b b b]) and instantiates a new object (e.g. [t b b]); btw. sometimes it is pretty hard (even for humans and cats) to know which part has been deleted by just looking at the "before and after"
i guess we all agree that it would be a fine feature. i guess nobody wants to implement it, though...
mfg.asdr. IOhannes
Didn't think of that. I recall that now, the old object is deleted. Oh well.
--
"Far and away the best prize that life has to offer is the chance to
work hard at work worth doing."
-Theodore Roosevelt