17 Nov
2003
17 Nov
'03
10:13 a.m.
Hallo, Luke Yelavich hat gesagt: // Luke Yelavich wrote:
At 11:50 AM 17/11/2003, guenter geiger wrote:
Yes, exactly. For the JACK case this is needed, otherwise the jackd would kick pd out of its chain. We only "fool" JACK into making it believe that we can meet the deadlines in all circumstances, while in reality we can't.
Could anything be done to improve this? Or would this also mean other major rewrites elsewhere?
I'd love it to have a kind of Low-Latency-TODO-list for everyone to work on.
And what about dsp externals? They shouldn't be allowed non-reatime safe taskes inside their signal functions as well, should they?
ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__