hi Jamie
it'd be nice to have a setable r~/s~ or catch~/throw~... attached a solution with throw~ -> catch~ -> s~ -> r~ so you can set both. that will delay the signal about 2 blocks :-( and i think it might not be suitable for dynamic patching since it will get an error without the catch~ or s~ .. good luck!
eni
On Aug 11, 2006, at 10:26 AM, Jamie Bullock wrote:
Hi,
This kind of follows on from the recent thread about settable [s]. One thing I have never understood about PD, is why only one side of the [catch~]/[throw~], [s~]/[r~] is settable, and why it is the sender with the former, and the receiver with the latter?
It would be a really useful feature for me to have at least one of these settable at both ends. I am achieving this at the moment with a dynamic patching kludge, but it is quite nasty.
Does anyone think this is worth adding as a feature request, or know an alternate method (without externals).
Jamie
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list