Hallo, frablanc hat gesagt: // frablanc wrote:
Finally, i solved the problem in a quite empiric way, but it seems to work ... I agree, it deserves a lot of cleaning, i put a lot of [bang] to be shure that the coefficients are right...
I send the final abstraction, and a patch which uses it. It's quite fun and i think it sounds great ! ;-)
Yes, it sound really wonderful I like it a lot (so much I'll steal it, if you don't mind ;)
Only with the execution order you still didn't get it right. it might work now, but as soon as you do some further editing it *will* break. Better fix it now. The [bang] objects don't help at all, let me explain why: Every "connection fanning" in your patch still has an undefined order. If two or more connections come out of a message outlet, you cannot tell which one will fire first. If order is important, and it practically *always* is, then you must use a trigger object instead of connection fanning.
So you should generally avoid more than one connection coming out of a single message outlet. It's trouble waiting to happen, you don't want to marry such patches.
Attached patch shows some of the things that can go wrong with connection fanning.
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__