Dan Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 14:13 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
so it can wither away in a corner? Does it offer something that mrpeach doesn't?
well, you use only one object instead of two (but of course you can build [dumpOSC]/[sendOSC] as abstractions with mrpeach's objects) i don't know any other "advantage"
One nice thing about sendOSC is that it does not complain to the console when the recipient machine is not running, unlike udpsend. I have some patches that forward OSC to two machines, but when I'm testing one is not running and its annoying to have to go in and close the udpsend.
hmm, i would rather say that it is a feature that the [udpsend] complains if it is not connected.
to not get a constant stream of errors (for every message sent to the unconnected [udpsend]) i usually use a [spigot] controlled by the connection state (output of [udpsend])
fgmasdr IOhannes