Hi Francois,
I've just been loading paf~s into abstractions in the last week... The only thing to watch is that there isn't a path problem; perhaps for some reason the abstraction isn't finding paf~ because the search path in the abstraction is different from that of the "owning" patch. However, I don't know how you would get the paths to be different! What I do in situations like this is to put everything in the same directory, verify that it works that way, and then go back and try to make it work with the files organized "correctly".
By the way, I've just discovered that PAF 0.5 has a problem with clicks if the frequency or bandwidth are changed suddenly. I've fixed that in my copy but you won't see the fix until I get release 0.31 together.
cheers Miller
On Sat, Mar 18, 2000 at 10:32:27PM +0100, F.Ernst wrote:
Hello,
With PD 0.30 I have a problem with paf~
When paf~ is used in an abstraction loaded from the disk included in a patch you get:
paf~ ... couldn't create
But if before that, you load a patch which contains directly a paf~ opcode it will work.
Francois Ernst