Hello, thanks IOhannes. And sorry for the late answer: I actually wrote an external that does what I need. Somehow had the feeling that this might be faster than trying to locate and adapt related existing ones...
I still have to polish the code --- it's still very rough and ugly at the moment. Once I've done that I guess I may share it (have to talk with my bosses ;-)...) with anybody who may be interested.
Btw: this InertiaCube3 indeed seems to work very well --- robust and fast (without having done any profound measurements, just from feeling)...
Greetings, Matthias
-----Original Message----- From: IOhannes m zmoelnig [mailto:zmoelnig@iem.at] Sent: Montag, 16. Januar 2006 10:26 To: Rath, Matthias Cc: pd-list@iem.at Subject: Re: [PD] external for Intersense InertiaCube3?
Rath, Matthias wrote:
Hello alltogether,
I'm planning to write an external for the integration of the Intersense InertiaCube3 in pd. Before starting with the job, of course I'd prefer to make sure that it has not been done before by somebody else (in order to avoid redundant work...).
So, I'd be thankful to anybody for information about possible existing implementations that may be of interest for me in this respect.
tm has written an external for the InterSense itrax. i don't know how this relates to the InertiaCube3.
the other question is, whether the InterSense-drivers support the hid-protocol. if so, you could just use [hid], if you were on linux/osx; if on w32, you'd have to convince hcs to finish the port (money usually helps...).
this would be the best.
mf.asdr IOhannes