19 Aug
2012
19 Aug
'12
4:56 a.m.
On 18.8.2012, at 21:00 , IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
- in retrospect i consider it a mistake to have split the "pd-ot" list from "pd-list": in 2012 we have a total of about 22 mails on that list (so it's virtually unused), whereas there are still "[OT]" mails on Pd-list, and i don't see a real reason why to ban the occassional OT mail from it.
Although I'm subscribed to all Pd-lists I almost missed some interesting discussion on Pd-OT (hey Ed! ). I just had a look only because you mentioned that. Just out of an impulse I'd like to suggest to close this OT-list and simply follow the netiquette of proper tagging. another 2c, Michael. ;-)
-- nonconform? noiseconform: http://blauwurf.at http://soundcloud.com/noiseconformist