16 Feb
2010
16 Feb
'10
12:44 a.m.
In 0, 0, 1, 2, 3, etc. Between 0 and 0 there is no 'time' in logical time. It is like a [trigger]. So, using a change to get 0, 1, 2, 3 should be OK. ++
Jack
Le mardi 16 février 2010 à 00:35 +0100, ypatios a écrit :
On 16 February 2010 00:13, Jack jack@rybn.org wrote: First, you output 0, then you go from 0 to 10 in 200 ms, no ?
Yes, but why repeat 0 while going from 0 to 10?
For example, if you want to go from -10 to 0 and then from there to 10 you would get something like:
... -3 -2 -1 0 (pause) 0 1 2 3 ...
here 0 is repeated, something that i don't find very practical. I could always use a [change ] but then again there would be a time gap, wouldn't it?
-- ypatios