Sort of. I think it's a bad idea to go through and close all the windows (sometimes closing a window takes time) - but just send objects a message in case they need to get off some resource. I don't have any examples to hand, except a rather lame one: sending an all-notes-off message to some MIDI output.
cheers M
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 08:54:12PM +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
On 01/19/2016 08:35 PM, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote:
Next: for people who are trying to close OS resources when Pd quits, I'm
thinking there should be a fourth phase, "LB_PANIC", which objects should not respond to by passing messages but only closing resources. What's a situation where Pd currently won't close its resources upon quitting?
you mean https://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/patches/82/?
i'm pretty exited about LB_PANIC as it suggests that #82 might get resolved!
gfamrds IOhannes
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list