27 Nov
2007
27 Nov
'07
9:34 a.m.
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007, at 3:43 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
.pd_darwin is still supported for legacy externals.
Pd-extended only builds objects using .pd_darwin as an extension. It
works fine for i386, PowerPC, and universal binaries.
but then, pd-extended _is_ a legacy project (no harm intended from my side; there is nothing wrong with that)
once Pd-extended grows to 0.41, chances are high that it will support the .d_fat idiom too. in the meantime, we can argue whether it was a good idea to have different suffixes for different OS's _and_ architectures (but why should we?)
gmadsr IOhannes