I've only played with OSC a little, but some things that come to mind:
use blocks of 32 or 64 values rather than sending each one individually. That way your packet overhead is smaller.
but the spec lists them as IEEE32s, check on what you are getting at the receiving end.
you can't be sure of the delivery order (or of delivery at all).
see
http://opensoundcontrol.org/spec-1_0
On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 22:21:17 +0100 Jerome Tuncer columbiatwo@free.fr wrote:
Hi everyone,
In the process of building some kind of audio oscilloscope in Gem I'm trying to send values from a table/array from one computer's PD to another's through OSC.
At the moment, my chosen solution is to have a counter scan the table, then pack the values (X & Y) and send them through a:
[send /OSC/Whatever/The/Name $1 $2(
Anyway, I do have this feeling that this is not a smart solution.
Anyone has ever done it before (send array values through OSC)/has a cleverer idea ?
Danke,
Jérôme
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list