16 Apr
2007
16 Apr
'07
2 a.m.
yeah, [frame( does the trick. no problem with the spam. but next time you rather have a beer with me than playing around with gem the whole evening.... ;-)
roman
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 01:40 +0200, moritz wrote:
moritz wrote:
hello
i could not find how to give gemhead a lower rate, right now it gives 20 "gem_state" per second, i only need 12 per second. i think i can save cpu with that, or am i wrong?
thanx
moritz
ooups, i just find out, that the frame argument for [gemwin] sets the speed for [gemhead] too.
sorry for my spam
moritz
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de