yes:
ldconfig -v|grep lame libmp3lame.so.0 -> libmp3lame.so.0.0.0 libmp3lame.so.0 -> libmp3lame.so.0.0.0
.gif
Wednesday February 26 2003 16:45, skrev Yves Degoyon:
is the location where it is installed is included in /etc/ld.so.conf ??
does a 'ldconfig -v' includes the lame libraries ??
220hex wrote:
I reinstalled lame and libmp3lame from the source package, so here's what I've got:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 376246 2002-06-30 18:04 libmp3lame.a -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 668 2002-06-30 18:04 libmp3lame.la lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2003-02-26 01:11 libmp3lame.so -> libmp3lame.so.0.0.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2003-02-25 23:47 libmp3lame.so.0 -> libmp3lame.so.0.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 347012 2003-02-25 23:47 libmp3lame.so.0.0.0
still not recognised from .configure...
.gif
Wednesday February 26 2003 15:36, skrev Yves Degoyon:
surely true !! tom !!
but that's really silly from debian.
cheers,
sevy/yves
Tom Schouten wrote:
for the lame issue, i think it doesn't find libmp3lame which must be in a weird location on debian ((
can't help you more from that distance )
maybe it has something to do with the fact that on debian, the libmp3lame package has only static libararies?
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 352520 Aug 16 2001 libmp3lame.a -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 668 Aug 16 2001 libmp3lame.la
maybe AC_CHECK_LIB(mp3lame) does not include statics?
