I don't know much about this, but i'm pretty sure you can't get as low a latency as that of Linux and Mac OS in windows. The thing is that "performance and studio" doesn't mean anything per se. If you only need a drum machine or a sequencer for your performance, then you don't really care about latency at all. Same for recording. Latency only becomes a problem when you need to process your sound in real time (if you want to apply an effect on a voice for instance), or when you need to do some overdubbing (recording a track while listening to another). For this you need a real low latency, which implies direct access to the processor for your audio data, and i don't think Windows allows that.
2010/8/1 Michal Seta mis@artengine.ca
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Jeffrey Concepcion jeffreyconcepcion@gmail.com wrote:
i already have an acer netbook, but the issues there are horrifying latency and breakup of the sound (at least on windows), pierre's solution seems like my ticket for now, as i don't need to have the system on me.
FYI, we have purchased some recent eeepc (I cannot tell exactly which, I don't have the info at hand). It was pre-loaded with windows 7. I installed ubuntu loaded with the necessary libraries and pd. I have experimented with running our pd patches under windows but the performance terrible compared to linux (even before tweaking any settings to improve performance). I could run the same setup on an Acer Aspire One but the processing is not very intensive, in any case. On the other hand, I do not know how to make Windows efficient, it must be possible since there are so many people relying on it for performance and studio work.
./MiS
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list