23 Apr
2013
23 Apr
'13
12:20 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2013-04-23 11:50, Joe White wrote:
Out of curiosity, are the workarounds suggested more of a result of the difficulty of extending the Pd core rather than the implications that such a change might have?
the implementation would be trivial (merely removing the safeguards that currently clamp the value to 0)
fgmasdr IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAlF2YIEACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvQyoQCgiC95SRoOKaOHu6qkmpX+kD80
/ugAoJymAbmtt6qWkZM5rAlObyhdarRF
=KUIu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----