On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 16:55 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Feb 22, 2010, at 4:50 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2010-02-13 05:54, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
FYI: I agree with Roman. I already removed the 0.42 aliasing feature from Pd-extended 0.42.5
FYI: i agree with Roman, but i don't think it's a good idea to divert the behaviours of PdX and Pd in such cases: it will only make
transition even nastier than it is.I see no way to support that 0.42 aliasing feature without mountains
of work to achieve poor results. Of course, anyone should feel free
to prove me wrong.
Could that problem be solved by removing the aliasing feature in the next release of Pd-vanilla, so that both Pd-extended and Pd-vanilla would be in sync again? Is it because I am biased or are there really hardly any voices advocating that feature?
Roman