Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
Ah, true.
So my suggestion would be to use something like *.pd_lua, *.pdlua or *.l_lua as extension. What do you think? The same question may become an issue for other loaders as well, so a standard solution would be nice.
Ok, expect this change in the next release (sometime in March). I'm leaning towards *.pd_lua personally, to match *.pd_linux and *.pd_darwin, but if anyone has strong objections let me know.
i too think that "*.pd_lua" would be the best choice, even though *.pd_linux" seems to be deprecated in feavour of *.l_i386/*.l_ia64; since the lua-scripts are supposed to be platform&architecture independent the "l" and "${arch}" part so not make much sense, so i guess *.pd_lua is the best choice.
(the point of this email is mainly, that *.pd_linux,... is not necessarily the best template to build on, even though in this case it is)
fmgasd.r IOhannes