NSL - (Nemo Seagull License) "Mine. Mine, mine, mine. Mine, mine, mine, mine, mine." http://www.chrisdiclerico.com/images/mine.jpg http://www.moviewavspage.com/movies/finding_nemo/mine.wav
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Friday, Apr 23, 2004, at 12:13 America/New_York, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: We should also discuss the license up front. My vote is for Creative Commons ShareAlike (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/sa/1.0/ ) for the written materials, and GNU GPL for the code. GPL for code is fine, but I'm on a - as Josh would put it, and I like that word ;) - "personal vendetta" against CC licenses, so I'd rather not put my material under this kind of license. Unfortunatly I didn't find another one, that is in widespread use and still fits all people. GNU Free Documentation would be nice in general, but seems to have several problems with several things (see debian.org). Darn, I don't know much else than that I don't like CC, and I can't even put my CC aversion into sensible words.
Well, it would be good to have some reasons, because as far as I know, the CC ShareAlike license would fit this very well. We could also just GPL and call it a day, but there seems to be reasons to not GPL docs, which I don't really know.
.hc