On 2/2/21, Alexandre Torres Porres porres@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
I haven't really compared the implementations of ceammc, but what usually happens is that externals from ceammc have some particularities that are special to that fork of Pd, like special messages using "@", and they're usually integrated into that system. Having a single, light, updated and independent version of soundtouch~ for all systems seems like a good idea.
[...]
In the meantime I did some attempts to build pd-ceammc but failed so still can't compare, but I get your point. The method(s) to avoid nameclash could be documented in the readme text.