On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 07:38:32PM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Chris McCormick wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 03:59:14PM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
You'll have to come up with a more phenomenological approach than picking whatever currently looks the most impredictable thing in the science book.
Why? Randomness is epistemic.
What does that mean to you ?
Epistemic: Adjective - "Of or relating to knowledge or to the degree of its validation."
It means I think that taking whatever currently looks the most impredictable thing in the science book is a good approach.
Don't run a lottery with Miller's [noise~] unless you like giving away money.
Cheers,
Chris.