26 Jan
2004
26 Jan
'04
6:15 p.m.
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, David NG McCallum hat gesagt: // David NG McCallum wrote:
At first glance this looks like a bad thing.
But when I think about all the trouble I go through to get $ arguments into messages I think this would solve that nicely...
While we're at it: I would *LOVE* to have a variable length argument called $* as in bash, that just matches all incoming messages. Then
isn't this $@ ?
and while we are at it: $# would be cool too.
and yes indeed, i would *love* this too
mfg.asd.r IOhannes