Hallo, marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:
I don't know how easy/difficult an implementation of new variable names would be. I would give most priority to any kind of $0 feature in messages. and then the next step for me would be to differentiate between $-variables (in messages) and # or ? or @ variables in patches. that way you would not break backwards compatibility, and a #0 or ?0 or @0 in a message or an object would behave like the old $0 var in objects.
ATM I cannot think of a way, that introduces # as a substitute for $ in "$1 ..." messages, that would *not* break backwards compatibility: What if someone already used #1 in a message to mean just a literal "#1"?
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__