Hi Kyle,
Thanks - I should have mentioned that I use bonk~ in some patches as
well.
I've had better luck with it though when there's not too many
different simultaneous frequencies going on.
That's what got me filtering the input first- but I will take another
look at it, maybe i just didn't use it's full possibilities.
-p
On Sep 1, 2006, at 3:41 PM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Instead of filters, try using bonk~, which you can train tto differentiate various attacks and label them accordingly in its output.
~Kyle
On 9/1/06, Paris Treantafeles paris@parisgraphics.com wrote:
Hello List,
I have some Gem patches that react to incoming sound in various ways. Up until now, I would take the adc~ input and use 3 vcf~ 's (one for bass, mid and high) and with the right settings of Hz and Q, I was getting fairly good envelopes. Looking at this again and wanting to improve it, I have been experimenting with iemlib filters: http://pd.iem.at/iemlib/abstract.html
I was wondering if anyone can recommend which of these would be best for trying to isolate, say a bass drum or a hi hat from an
incoming mix?I read the Bessel filters are often used in cross overs but from just experimenting a bit it seems some of the others (e.g. vcf_lp2~) are giving me a better response.
Thanks, p
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
--
http://theradioproject.com http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list