7 Sep
2002
7 Sep
'02
2:35 p.m.
Mathieu,
do not hesitate to be harsh! I really do appreciate your expertise, so please, come straight to the point -- do you mean that
Pd is not reliable? (What is then?)
Simple (or is it simplistic?) design is not relevant to
reliability of, in effect, a single-man's project?
- The feature of being able to define new atom types does not
complicate the design (this is quite possible, hence my 'perhaps')?
Krzysztof
Mathieu Bouchard wrote: ... perhaps this 'minimalistic' attitude is one of the reasons, why Pd
is (still!) a reliable performance tool...
...
To be nice with you I will call that an 'opinion'.