i think, the samplingrate, that pd thinks it is using and the one that it is actually using, are differnt.
try an [osc~ 440], it will sound like a d.
can't tell, what is causing that confusion. check your soundcard settings. 1.5 could be related to 32kHz (real) <-> 48kHz (imaginary) confusion.
roman
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 21:09 +0200, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote:
Hi, This drives me crazy.
I'm trying PD 0.42-4 on Windows Vista. Always used XP before.
Logical time runs 50% slower than real time, i.e. 1000 logical millisecond pass in approximately 1500 real milliseconds. Yet there is no abnormal CPU consumption.
Try the attached patch. On any normal Windows XP machine I test it on, the number box will increase one unit every one second.
On my laptop with Windows Vista, which is a Core Duo T9300, it increments every 1.5 seconds approximately.
I haven't tested yet what happens with signals.
Any ideas?????
Thanks m. plain text document attachment (test_time.pd) #N canvas 321 345 584 396 12; #X obj 233 67 tgl 15 0 empty empty empty 17 7 0 10 -262144 -1 -1 0 1; #X obj 233 128 metro 1000; #X obj 229 174 timer; #X floatatom 235 258 5 0 0 0 - - -; #X obj 228 204 / 1000; #X obj 231 94 t f f; #X obj 124 139 select 1; #X connect 0 0 5 0; #X connect 1 0 2 1; #X connect 2 0 4 0; #X connect 4 0 3 0; #X connect 5 0 1 0; #X connect 5 1 6 0; #X connect 6 0 2 0; _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de