-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Caio Barros wrote:
IOhannes m zmölnig:
I'm not requesting this changes, i'm just asking if this is possible,
since
this is a "non suported feature".
in open source development there is not much difference between the two :-)
Maybe if you are a programmer, yes. But if you are just a humble composer student as I am you can only wait for a good soul to hear your prayers. (Or maybe pay a good soul to hear you prayers, but that's not for humble composer students).
i guess you misunderstood me. i understood that you won't code the features yourself; how would a "request for a feature" be different from a question of "whether this 'can' be done (hopefully by someone else who feels like this is indeed a good idea and who has the skills to implement them)", apart from the level of politeness?
both are merely asking, whether someone knows how to do it and whether this (or some other) person is actually willing to do it.
that's all the might you have when you "request".
(but there already has been a thread on the issue of 'request's on this mailinglist; it turns out that 'request' translates differently in the various languages, so some people see it as a "question whether it is possible" while for others it is more a "demand" (e.g. something they think they have a right to))
Thanks for the help, i'll look for iemguts.
There is another thing that don't work with dynamically created objects that is the [loadbang] object.
please read the archives on this topic (there are numerous search interfaces to this mailinglist, one of them being at http://lists.puredata.info/serach/Pd-list) the last time, this question popped up on 23rd february, so you might already have been subscribed to the list. in short: this is a feature, not a bug
mfd IOhannes