On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Lorenzo Sutton lorenzofsutton@gmail.comwrote:
On 06/12/12 15:31, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Leaving out [rate~] should use less CPU since [rate~] doesn't have to do the analysis part, if I understand it correctly.
If I understand correctly what rate~ does, the argument is actually a factor, so I thnk the frequency for the phasor~ has to be 1 / factor... So for example
[rate~ 1.5]
is [phasor~ 0.666667]
Lorenzo.
"rate~ accepts an input signal from a phasor~ and time scales it by a multiplier received as a float in its right inlet". This is what the help patch says. Although, in the oscilloscope of the patch it looks like it is divided indeed. Dunno..
.hc
On Dec 6, 2012, at 9:24 AM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
Don't think I really follow. Each [rate~] actually outputs a [phasor~]
with a different frequency (different frequency ratio), all driven by the same [phasor~]. How can you send a value from one number box to all [phasor~]s?
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.atmailto: hans@at.or.at> wrote:
Why not just use a phasor~ per rate~ and then have the frequency of all them controlled by the same number box? .hc On Dec 6, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: copy this patchhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?**v=6P4Ezz9aWa8&feature=plcp<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6P4Ezz9aWa8&feature=plcp> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Simon Iten <itensimon@gmail.com <mailto:itensimon@gmail.com>> wrote: What are you trying to accomplish? On Dec 6, 2012 2:48 PM, "Alexandros Drymonitis" <adrcki@gmail.com <mailto:adrcki@gmail.com>> wrote: How can one implement Max's [rate~] in Pd? [rate~] takes a signal from a [phasor~] and according to its argument it scales the frequency (roughly speaking). So [phasor~ 1] | [rate~ 1.5] will actually give a [phasor~ 1.5]. I thought of [wrap] but that won't do the trick with non-integers. Any ideas? ______________________________**_________________ Pd-list@iem.at <mailto:Pd-list@iem.at> mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/**listinfo/pd-list<http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list> ______________________________**_________________ Pd-list@iem.at <mailto:Pd-list@iem.at> mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/**listinfo/pd-list<http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list>______________________________**_________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/** listinfo/pd-list http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
______________________________**_________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/** listinfo/pd-list http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list