On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Aug 10, 2006, at 5:33 AM, geiger wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
All that content is already on puredata.org. That sourceforge page is just an old copy of things that hasn't been maintained since Oct. 2004.
Not updated != not maintained. I think the information there
These pages are out of date:
well, i have seen worse on the puredata.org page. all the links work, and point to the right resource.
this page has never been really finished. I would say 50% of puredata.org are in the same state.
is still valuable and easier to access than the WIKI. I am also missing the information about the trackers on the WIKI, but maybe I just didn't look hard enough.
Ah, ok the trackers page isn't in puredata.org
http://pure-data.sourceforge.net/trackers.php
but it would be trivial to move it there. Something like:
http://puredata.org/dev/trackers
There is already a link to the bug tracker:
http://puredata.org/dev/bugtracker/
I would happily move that page to puredata.org if you agree that we can redirect pure-data.sourceforge.net to puredata.org
Everything that avoids duplication is good for me.
I think that puredata.org needs a bit more work than just copying the link to the feature and patch trackers.
-) http://puredata.org/dev/ has several broken links (externals, abstraction, etc, etc.. -) what is the difference between puredata.org/dev and http://puredata.org/docs/developer/ ? its bad to have the information in two different places. maybe we can merge this. -) Instead(or in addition) of having a link to a list of bugs, the bug tracker should have a link to the bug submit page (same for feature request and patches).
In general I find the wiki pretty confusing, but maybe I am just too old and conservative. I would say we try to fix this, so that changing the link really is an improvement of the situation.
Günter