Yep,
Got it.
That's how it should be done. At least that's how I do it (-:
++
Jé
Nuno Godinho a écrit :
Hi Jé,
I am sorry if I didn't explain it well enough.
I want to avoid having to send the message "open n0.avi" into the "sub" abstraction. I will be using several instances of "sub". The problem is that when I create the object like "sub n0.avi", which should be defining the $1 (the leftmost inlet, right?) parameter, nothing happens. Get it? Now I have to send the filename through an inlet. I would like to define it as an inline constant argument. I just don't understand how to do it.
Maybe it would be easier if you could send me a working example of an object sending inline arguments into an abstraction.
Thanks, Nuno
-----Original Message----- From: pd-list-bounces@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-bounces@iem.at] On Behalf Of Jerome Tuncer Sent: quinta-feira, 8 de Dezembro de 2005 20:26 To: pd-list@iem.at Subject: Re: [PD] Inlinet creation arguments into abstracts
Hhhhhmmmmmmm...
I'm not sure I'm getting it right here.
Your patch actually works but what you'd like to do is make it simpler in case you have more instances of that sub.pd??
What's the relationship between this and creation arguments of the instance of the abstract.?
Sorry for being so dumb it doesn't appear clearly to me (-:
++
Jé
Nuno Godinho a écrit :
Hi Georg,
I found it on the docs but I still can't figure out how to
use it. I
actually tried to add an argument to an abstract but nothing really happened.
I am sending you a dumb example attached so that you can,
if possible,
tell me what am I doing wrong. Inside "main" I have an instance of "sub" and now I have to send it "open n0.avi" in order to
make it load
the n0.avi file. I would like to just write "sub n0.avi".
Can you help me understand this? It seems to be quite
simple but I am
lost here.
Thanks, Nuno
-----Original Message----- From: Georg Holzmann [mailto:grhPD@gmx.at] Sent: quinta-feira, 8 de Dezembro de 2005 19:06 To: Nuno Godinho Cc: pd-list@iem.at Subject: Re: [PD] Inlinet creation arguments into abstracts
Hallo!
anyone help me or point me to documentation? Pd
documentation talks a
lot about "creation arguments" but never explains how they
actually work. I'm shure it is explained somewhere, but don't know where ... In pd you can use $1 for first creation argument, $2 for the second etc.
LG Georg
--
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
#N canvas 231 355 892 451 10; #N canvas 0 0 450 300 gemwin 0; #X obj 132 136 gemwin; #X obj 67 89 outlet; #X obj 67 10 inlet; #X obj 67 41 route create; #X msg 67 70 set destroy; #X msg 142 68 set create; #X msg 132 112 create , 1; #X msg 198 112 destroy; #X connect 2 0 3 0; #X connect 3 0 4 0; #X connect 3 0 6 0; #X connect 3 1 5 0; #X connect 3 1 7 0; #X connect 4 0 1 0; #X connect 5 0 1 0; #X connect 6 0 0 0; #X connect 7 0 0 0; #X restore 5 27 pd gemwin; #X msg 5 8 create; #X obj 107 88 sub n0.avi; #X connect 0 0 1 0; #X connect 1 0 0 0; #X coords 0 0 0.00102564 0.00161551 200 140 0;
#N canvas 1493 149 639 630 10; #X obj 24 53 gemhead; #X obj 24 119 pix_film; #X obj 24 152 outlet; #X obj 83 53 inlet; #X obj 128 -22 loadbang; #X obj 128 10 symbol $1; #X msg 128 53 open $1; #X text 201 4 The OBJECT [symbol] will be instanciated with parameter $1; #X text 201 48 The $x in MESSAGES will be replaced by the parameter that; #X text 201 16 that is given to the parent abstraction (sub).; #X text 201 61 is given to its inlet.; #X connect 0 0 1 0; #X connect 1 0 2 0; #X connect 3 0 1 0; #X connect 4 0 5 0; #X connect 5 0 6 0; #X connect 6 0 1 0;