26 Feb
2016
26 Feb
'16
4:38 a.m.
On 26/02/16 03:21, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
howdy, is there any particularly good reason why [s~]/[r~] must run at only 64 block sizes?
if the issue is that they may have conflicting/different sizes between them, why not give the same error as you get now for blocks other than 64?
"receive~ x: vector size mismatch sigsend x: unexpected vector size"
It'd be really convenient for feedback loops
if you want something that works right now, tabsend~ and tabreceive~ don't have any restriction about table size must be equal to block size must be equal to 64
see attached example of a single self-modulating fm oscillator with single sample feedback (block~ 1)