Frank Barknecht wrote:
i would totally agree (if i didn't use dynamic senders/receivers myself sometimes)
Note that I consider dynamic *senders* to be very useful, Sending to
i was really talking about dynamic *receivers* (it just happens that i use them almost exclusively in conjunction with dynamic senders)
different targets is as natural as talking to different people.
exactly. imagine sliders are taking part in a theater. one of them is dynamic and thus has to change its role every now and then (once it is frank, then it is matju), because the theatre is low on actors. the only important thing is that the director has a possibility to talk directly to the actors (and not to the roles they are playing). this is where the direct connection comes into the play (as opposed to send/receive).
i need these kind of tricks for a mixer where you can access a channel via the "channel section" and additionally there is a "focus section" for the "selected" channel. very simple if you can tell the gain-slider in the "focus section" to "just be" the gain-slider of channel X.
mfg.adsr IOhannes