yo.. very nice!
you're definitely making my pd life easier!!
roman
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 13:24 -0400, Matt Barber wrote:
Not to be a stinker,
These are very easy to implement as abstractions in Pd vanilla even without expr~, yes-no?
[>~] :
[inlet~] [inlet] | / [-~ $1] | [max~ 0] |
[/~] | [outlet~][<~] :
[inlet~] [inlet] | / [-~ $1] | [min~ 0] |
[/~] | [outlet~][==~] :
[inlet~] [inlet] | / [-~ $1] | \[sig~ 1] [/~ ] __ _/ [-~] | [outlet~]
or :
[inlet~] [inlet] | / [-~ $1] |
[/~] | [*~ -1] | [+~ 1] | [outlet~]Not that this helps at all with the special character problem, and they're bound to be less efficient. One cool thing, though, is the ability to turn both inlets into signal inlets (but ditching the $1).
Matt
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:18:08 +0900 From: "hard off" hard.off@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PD] really annoying question about tildes~ To: "IOhannes m zmoelnig" zmoelnig@iem.at Cc: pd-list@iem.at Message-ID: 161320dd0807180218p74f5d585j62f2f9aeffb837c9@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
yeah totally.
it seems nonsensical that pd has > and < for control signals, but not for audiorate signals.
and as andy obiwan mentioned before [pow~] would also be very useful.
as far as i can guess, all of these objects are very simple code-wise.
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
___________________________________________________________ Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de